Mateusz Wasiluk vs Jakub Pieczeniak
POL Ch U20 2025, 2025 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack (B76).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mateusz Wasiluk vs Jakub Pieczeniak with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mateusz Wasiluk (1875)
- Black
- Jakub Pieczeniak (1597)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- POL Ch U20 2025
- Year
- 2025
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack (B76)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mateusz Wasiluk (1875) and Jakub Pieczeniak (1597) was played at POL Ch U20 2025 in 2025 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack (B76). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mateusz Wasiluk games or Jakub Pieczeniak games? This Mateusz Wasiluk vs Jakub Pieczeniak encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mateusz Wasiluk vs Jakub Pieczeniak?
Mateusz Wasiluk vs Jakub Pieczeniak (2025) finished 1–0, a win for Mateusz Wasiluk.
What opening was played in Mateusz Wasiluk vs Jakub Pieczeniak?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack (ECO B76).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mateusz Wasiluk vs Jakub Pieczeniak, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.