Bernd Waschnewski vs Frank Prskawetz
2007 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation (A35).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Bernd Waschnewski vs Frank Prskawetz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Bernd Waschnewski (1608)
- Black
- Frank Prskawetz (2089)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2007
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation (A35)
About this chess game
This chess game between Bernd Waschnewski (1608) and Frank Prskawetz (2089) was played in 2007 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation (A35). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Bernd Waschnewski games or Frank Prskawetz games? This Bernd Waschnewski vs Frank Prskawetz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Bernd Waschnewski vs Frank Prskawetz?
Bernd Waschnewski vs Frank Prskawetz (2007) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Bernd Waschnewski vs Frank Prskawetz?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation (ECO A35).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Bernd Waschnewski vs Frank Prskawetz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.