Markus Wantoch von Rekowski vs Patrick Hugentobler
2018 · Result ½–½ · French Defense: Exchange Variation (C01).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Markus Wantoch von Rekowski vs Patrick Hugentobler with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Markus Wantoch von Rekowski (1999)
- Black
- Patrick Hugentobler (2224)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- French Defense: Exchange Variation (C01)
About this chess game
This chess game between Markus Wantoch von Rekowski (1999) and Patrick Hugentobler (2224) was played in 2018 and finished ½–½. The opening was the French Defense: Exchange Variation (C01). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Markus Wantoch von Rekowski games or Patrick Hugentobler games? This Markus Wantoch von Rekowski vs Patrick Hugentobler encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Markus Wantoch von Rekowski vs Patrick Hugentobler?
Markus Wantoch von Rekowski vs Patrick Hugentobler (2018) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Markus Wantoch von Rekowski vs Patrick Hugentobler?
The game opened with the French Defense: Exchange Variation (ECO C01).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Markus Wantoch von Rekowski vs Patrick Hugentobler, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.