Joachim Walther vs George E Hollands
WS/CCE/A/26, 2022 · Result ½–½ · French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C18).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Joachim Walther vs George E Hollands with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Joachim Walther (1910)
- Black
- George E Hollands (1856)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- WS/CCE/A/26
- Year
- 2022
- Opening
- French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C18)
About this chess game
This chess game between Joachim Walther (1910) and George E Hollands (1856) was played at WS/CCE/A/26 in 2022 and finished ½–½. The opening was the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C18). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Joachim Walther games or George E Hollands games? This Joachim Walther vs George E Hollands encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Joachim Walther vs George E Hollands?
Joachim Walther vs George E Hollands (2022) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Joachim Walther vs George E Hollands?
The game opened with the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (ECO C18).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Joachim Walther vs George E Hollands, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.