Paul Wallace vs David A Robertson
EU Union Ch, 2006 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Matanovic Attack (B82).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Paul Wallace vs David A Robertson with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Paul Wallace (2242)
- Black
- David A Robertson (1927)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- EU Union Ch
- Year
- 2006
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Matanovic Attack (B82)
About this chess game
This chess game between Paul Wallace (2242) and David A Robertson (1927) was played at EU Union Ch in 2006 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Matanovic Attack (B82). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Paul Wallace games or David A Robertson games? This Paul Wallace vs David A Robertson encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Matanovic Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Paul Wallace vs David A Robertson?
Paul Wallace vs David A Robertson (2006) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Paul Wallace vs David A Robertson?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Matanovic Attack (ECO B82).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Paul Wallace vs David A Robertson, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.