Piotr Walczak vs Horacio Daniel Rocca
15. IECG WCH-T-00005, 2010 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation (D35).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Piotr Walczak vs Horacio Daniel Rocca with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Piotr Walczak (1091)
- Black
- Horacio Daniel Rocca (2451)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 15. IECG WCH-T-00005
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation (D35)
About this chess game
This chess game between Piotr Walczak (1091) and Horacio Daniel Rocca (2451) was played at 15. IECG WCH-T-00005 in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation (D35). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Piotr Walczak games or Horacio Daniel Rocca games? This Piotr Walczak vs Horacio Daniel Rocca encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Piotr Walczak vs Horacio Daniel Rocca?
Piotr Walczak vs Horacio Daniel Rocca (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Horacio Daniel Rocca.
What opening was played in Piotr Walczak vs Horacio Daniel Rocca?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation (ECO D35).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Piotr Walczak vs Horacio Daniel Rocca, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.