Witold Walaszczyk vs Piotr Ziemniak
2015 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Carlsbad Variation (E62).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Witold Walaszczyk vs Piotr Ziemniak with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Witold Walaszczyk (2143)
- Black
- Piotr Ziemniak (1838)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Carlsbad Variation (E62)
About this chess game
This chess game between Witold Walaszczyk (2143) and Piotr Ziemniak (1838) was played in 2015 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Carlsbad Variation (E62). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Witold Walaszczyk games or Piotr Ziemniak games? This Witold Walaszczyk vs Piotr Ziemniak encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Carlsbad Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Witold Walaszczyk vs Piotr Ziemniak?
Witold Walaszczyk vs Piotr Ziemniak (2015) finished 1–0, a win for Witold Walaszczyk.
What opening was played in Witold Walaszczyk vs Piotr Ziemniak?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Carlsbad Variation (ECO E62).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Witold Walaszczyk vs Piotr Ziemniak, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.