Witold Walaszczyk vs Miroslaw Sobczak
2010 · Result 1–0 · Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Witold Walaszczyk vs Miroslaw Sobczak with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Witold Walaszczyk (2238)
- Black
- Miroslaw Sobczak (1975)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34)
About this chess game
This chess game between Witold Walaszczyk (2238) and Miroslaw Sobczak (1975) was played in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Witold Walaszczyk games or Miroslaw Sobczak games? This Witold Walaszczyk vs Miroslaw Sobczak encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Witold Walaszczyk vs Miroslaw Sobczak?
Witold Walaszczyk vs Miroslaw Sobczak (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Witold Walaszczyk.
What opening was played in Witold Walaszczyk vs Miroslaw Sobczak?
The game opened with the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (ECO D34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Witold Walaszczyk vs Miroslaw Sobczak, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.