Claude Wagener vs Klaus-Juergen Schulz
2017 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Modern Variation (B83).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Claude Wagener vs Klaus-Juergen Schulz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Claude Wagener (2234)
- Black
- Klaus-Juergen Schulz (2347)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Modern Variation (B83)
About this chess game
This chess game between Claude Wagener (2234) and Klaus-Juergen Schulz (2347) was played in 2017 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Modern Variation (B83). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Claude Wagener games or Klaus-Juergen Schulz games? This Claude Wagener vs Klaus-Juergen Schulz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Modern Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Claude Wagener vs Klaus-Juergen Schulz?
Claude Wagener vs Klaus-Juergen Schulz (2017) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Claude Wagener vs Klaus-Juergen Schulz?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Modern Variation (ECO B83).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Claude Wagener vs Klaus-Juergen Schulz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.