Winfried Wadsack vs Hermann Knoll
Steyr AUT, City Ch 2009, 2009 · Result 1–0 · Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense (C58).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Winfried Wadsack vs Hermann Knoll with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Winfried Wadsack (2163)
- Black
- Hermann Knoll (2389)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Steyr AUT, City Ch 2009
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense (C58)
About this chess game
This chess game between Winfried Wadsack (2163) and Hermann Knoll (2389) was played at Steyr AUT, City Ch 2009 in 2009 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense (C58). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Winfried Wadsack games or Hermann Knoll games? This Winfried Wadsack vs Hermann Knoll encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Winfried Wadsack vs Hermann Knoll?
Winfried Wadsack vs Hermann Knoll (2009) finished 1–0, a win for Winfried Wadsack.
What opening was played in Winfried Wadsack vs Hermann Knoll?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense (ECO C58).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Winfried Wadsack vs Hermann Knoll, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.