Lionel von Flottwell vs Julian Bork
Deutsche Vereinsmeisterschaft 2025 U10, 2025 · Result 1–0 · King's Knight Opening: Normal Variation (C44).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Lionel von Flottwell vs Julian Bork with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Lionel von Flottwell (1762)
- Black
- Julian Bork
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Deutsche Vereinsmeisterschaft 2025 U10
- Year
- 2025
- Opening
- King's Knight Opening: Normal Variation (C44)
About this chess game
This chess game between Lionel von Flottwell (1762) and Julian Bork was played at Deutsche Vereinsmeisterschaft 2025 U10 in 2025 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Knight Opening: Normal Variation (C44). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Lionel von Flottwell games or Julian Bork games? This Lionel von Flottwell vs Julian Bork encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Knight Opening: Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Lionel von Flottwell vs Julian Bork?
Lionel von Flottwell vs Julian Bork (2025) finished 1–0, a win for Lionel von Flottwell.
What opening was played in Lionel von Flottwell vs Julian Bork?
The game opened with the King's Knight Opening: Normal Variation (ECO C44).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Lionel von Flottwell vs Julian Bork, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.