Hans-joachim Von Der Heydt vs Sandor Szenczy
SA-00133, 2010 · Result 1–0 · Ruy Lopez: Closed, Chigorin Defense (C96).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Hans-joachim Von Der Heydt vs Sandor Szenczy with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Hans-joachim Von Der Heydt (2080)
- Black
- Sandor Szenczy (2068)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- SA-00133
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Closed, Chigorin Defense (C96)
About this chess game
This chess game between Hans-joachim Von Der Heydt (2080) and Sandor Szenczy (2068) was played at SA-00133 in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Closed, Chigorin Defense (C96). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Hans-joachim Von Der Heydt games or Sandor Szenczy games? This Hans-joachim Von Der Heydt vs Sandor Szenczy encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Closed, Chigorin Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Hans-joachim Von Der Heydt vs Sandor Szenczy?
Hans-joachim Von Der Heydt vs Sandor Szenczy (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Hans-joachim Von Der Heydt.
What opening was played in Hans-joachim Von Der Heydt vs Sandor Szenczy?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Closed, Chigorin Defense (ECO C96).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Hans-joachim Von Der Heydt vs Sandor Szenczy, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.