Saveliy Volkov vs Stelios Halkias
6. EICC, 2005 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Attack (D64).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Saveliy Volkov vs Stelios Halkias with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Saveliy Volkov (2634)
- Black
- Stelios Halkias (2548)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 6. EICC
- Year
- 2005
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Attack (D64)
About this chess game
This chess game between Saveliy Volkov (2634) and Stelios Halkias (2548) was played at 6. EICC in 2005 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Attack (D64). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Saveliy Volkov games or Stelios Halkias games? This Saveliy Volkov vs Stelios Halkias encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Saveliy Volkov vs Stelios Halkias?
Saveliy Volkov vs Stelios Halkias (2005) finished 1–0, a win for Saveliy Volkov.
What opening was played in Saveliy Volkov vs Stelios Halkias?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Attack (ECO D64).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Saveliy Volkov vs Stelios Halkias, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.