Vladislav Voitovich vs Elizaveta Malakhova
3. Maksym Yusupov Memorial, 2015 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Pawn Game: Torre Attack (D03).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Vladislav Voitovich vs Elizaveta Malakhova with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Vladislav Voitovich (2321)
- Black
- Elizaveta Malakhova (2299)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 3. Maksym Yusupov Memorial
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Torre Attack (D03)
About this chess game
This chess game between Vladislav Voitovich (2321) and Elizaveta Malakhova (2299) was played at 3. Maksym Yusupov Memorial in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Torre Attack (D03). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Vladislav Voitovich games or Elizaveta Malakhova games? This Vladislav Voitovich vs Elizaveta Malakhova encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Torre Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Vladislav Voitovich vs Elizaveta Malakhova?
Vladislav Voitovich vs Elizaveta Malakhova (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Vladislav Voitovich vs Elizaveta Malakhova?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Torre Attack (ECO D03).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Vladislav Voitovich vs Elizaveta Malakhova, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.