Jaap Vogel vs Frank Schleipfenbauer
2010 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Main Line (E69).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jaap Vogel vs Frank Schleipfenbauer with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jaap Vogel (2210)
- Black
- Frank Schleipfenbauer (2110)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Main Line (E69)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jaap Vogel (2210) and Frank Schleipfenbauer (2110) was played in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Main Line (E69). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jaap Vogel games or Frank Schleipfenbauer games? This Jaap Vogel vs Frank Schleipfenbauer encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jaap Vogel vs Frank Schleipfenbauer?
Jaap Vogel vs Frank Schleipfenbauer (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Jaap Vogel vs Frank Schleipfenbauer?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Main Line (ECO E69).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jaap Vogel vs Frank Schleipfenbauer, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.