Roven Vogel vs Werner Kugelmann
21. OIBM 2017, 2017 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Standard Development (E73).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Roven Vogel vs Werner Kugelmann with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Roven Vogel (2493)
- Black
- Werner Kugelmann (2100)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 21. OIBM 2017
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Standard Development (E73)
About this chess game
This chess game between Roven Vogel (2493) and Werner Kugelmann (2100) was played at 21. OIBM 2017 in 2017 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Standard Development (E73). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Roven Vogel games or Werner Kugelmann games? This Roven Vogel vs Werner Kugelmann encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Standard Development.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Roven Vogel vs Werner Kugelmann?
Roven Vogel vs Werner Kugelmann (2017) finished 1–0, a win for Roven Vogel.
What opening was played in Roven Vogel vs Werner Kugelmann?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Standard Development (ECO E73).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Roven Vogel vs Werner Kugelmann, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.