Jaap Vogel vs Dirk Hoogland
2013 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Spielmann Defense (A32).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jaap Vogel vs Dirk Hoogland with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jaap Vogel (2202)
- Black
- Dirk Hoogland (2155)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Spielmann Defense (A32)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jaap Vogel (2202) and Dirk Hoogland (2155) was played in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Spielmann Defense (A32). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jaap Vogel games or Dirk Hoogland games? This Jaap Vogel vs Dirk Hoogland encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Spielmann Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jaap Vogel vs Dirk Hoogland?
Jaap Vogel vs Dirk Hoogland (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Jaap Vogel vs Dirk Hoogland?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Spielmann Defense (ECO A32).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jaap Vogel vs Dirk Hoogland, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.