Erik van Vliet vs Rüdiger Löschnauer
EU/TC12/sf3, 2021 · Result ½–½ · French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C17).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Erik van Vliet vs Rüdiger Löschnauer with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Erik van Vliet (2390)
- Black
- Rüdiger Löschnauer (2437)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- EU/TC12/sf3
- Year
- 2021
- Opening
- French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C17)
About this chess game
This chess game between Erik van Vliet (2390) and Rüdiger Löschnauer (2437) was played at EU/TC12/sf3 in 2021 and finished ½–½. The opening was the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C17). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Erik van Vliet games or Rüdiger Löschnauer games? This Erik van Vliet vs Rüdiger Löschnauer encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Erik van Vliet vs Rüdiger Löschnauer?
Erik van Vliet vs Rüdiger Löschnauer (2021) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Erik van Vliet vs Rüdiger Löschnauer?
The game opened with the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (ECO C17).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Erik van Vliet vs Rüdiger Löschnauer, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.