Stanislav Vlcek vs Alexander Nicolini
2010 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian (A21).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Stanislav Vlcek vs Alexander Nicolini with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Stanislav Vlcek (2283)
- Black
- Alexander Nicolini (2158)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian (A21)
About this chess game
This chess game between Stanislav Vlcek (2283) and Alexander Nicolini (2158) was played in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian (A21). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Stanislav Vlcek games or Alexander Nicolini games? This Stanislav Vlcek vs Alexander Nicolini encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Stanislav Vlcek vs Alexander Nicolini?
Stanislav Vlcek vs Alexander Nicolini (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Stanislav Vlcek vs Alexander Nicolini?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian (ECO A21).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Stanislav Vlcek vs Alexander Nicolini, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.