Juan Pedro Vivanco del Hoyo vs Jose Antonio Flores Mendoza
2000 · Result 0–1 · English Opening (A10).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Juan Pedro Vivanco del Hoyo vs Jose Antonio Flores Mendoza with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Juan Pedro Vivanco del Hoyo (1830)
- Black
- Jose Antonio Flores Mendoza (1966)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2000
- Opening
- English Opening (A10)
About this chess game
This chess game between Juan Pedro Vivanco del Hoyo (1830) and Jose Antonio Flores Mendoza (1966) was played in 2000 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening (A10). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Juan Pedro Vivanco del Hoyo games or Jose Antonio Flores Mendoza games? This Juan Pedro Vivanco del Hoyo vs Jose Antonio Flores Mendoza encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Juan Pedro Vivanco del Hoyo vs Jose Antonio Flores Mendoza?
Juan Pedro Vivanco del Hoyo vs Jose Antonio Flores Mendoza (2000) finished 0–1, a win for Jose Antonio Flores Mendoza.
What opening was played in Juan Pedro Vivanco del Hoyo vs Jose Antonio Flores Mendoza?
The game opened with the English Opening (ECO A10).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Juan Pedro Vivanco del Hoyo vs Jose Antonio Flores Mendoza, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.