Vitor Jose Batista Vitorazzi vs Arthur Olinto De Souza
2016 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Closed (B23).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Vitor Jose Batista Vitorazzi vs Arthur Olinto De Souza with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Vitor Jose Batista Vitorazzi (1650)
- Black
- Arthur Olinto De Souza (2107)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Closed (B23)
About this chess game
This chess game between Vitor Jose Batista Vitorazzi (1650) and Arthur Olinto De Souza (2107) was played in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Closed (B23). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Vitor Jose Batista Vitorazzi games or Arthur Olinto De Souza games? This Vitor Jose Batista Vitorazzi vs Arthur Olinto De Souza encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Closed.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Vitor Jose Batista Vitorazzi vs Arthur Olinto De Souza?
Vitor Jose Batista Vitorazzi vs Arthur Olinto De Souza (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Arthur Olinto De Souza.
What opening was played in Vitor Jose Batista Vitorazzi vs Arthur Olinto De Souza?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Closed (ECO B23).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Vitor Jose Batista Vitorazzi vs Arthur Olinto De Souza, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.