Marco Visconti vs Ferdinando Besozzi
ITA/WSTT/001/KG (ITA), 2020 · Result ½–½ · King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (C39).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Marco Visconti vs Ferdinando Besozzi with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Marco Visconti (2034)
- Black
- Ferdinando Besozzi (2220)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- ITA/WSTT/001/KG (ITA)
- Year
- 2020
- Opening
- King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (C39)
About this chess game
This chess game between Marco Visconti (2034) and Ferdinando Besozzi (2220) was played at ITA/WSTT/001/KG (ITA) in 2020 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (C39). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Marco Visconti games or Ferdinando Besozzi games? This Marco Visconti vs Ferdinando Besozzi encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Marco Visconti vs Ferdinando Besozzi?
Marco Visconti vs Ferdinando Besozzi (2020) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Marco Visconti vs Ferdinando Besozzi?
The game opened with the King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (ECO C39).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Marco Visconti vs Ferdinando Besozzi, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.