Pedro Vinal Gutierrez vs Juan Campos Calvo-Sotelo
ESP Ch Seniors 65+ 2017, 2017 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Pawn Game (A40).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Pedro Vinal Gutierrez vs Juan Campos Calvo-Sotelo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Pedro Vinal Gutierrez (2041)
- Black
- Juan Campos Calvo-Sotelo (1796)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- ESP Ch Seniors 65+ 2017
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game (A40)
About this chess game
This chess game between Pedro Vinal Gutierrez (2041) and Juan Campos Calvo-Sotelo (1796) was played at ESP Ch Seniors 65+ 2017 in 2017 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game (A40). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Pedro Vinal Gutierrez games or Juan Campos Calvo-Sotelo games? This Pedro Vinal Gutierrez vs Juan Campos Calvo-Sotelo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Pedro Vinal Gutierrez vs Juan Campos Calvo-Sotelo?
Pedro Vinal Gutierrez vs Juan Campos Calvo-Sotelo (2017) finished 1–0, a win for Pedro Vinal Gutierrez.
What opening was played in Pedro Vinal Gutierrez vs Juan Campos Calvo-Sotelo?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game (ECO A40).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Pedro Vinal Gutierrez vs Juan Campos Calvo-Sotelo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.