Ricardo Pereira Vilalba vs Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva
2010 · Result ½–½ · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (E21).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ricardo Pereira Vilalba vs Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ricardo Pereira Vilalba (1841)
- Black
- Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva (1951)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (E21)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ricardo Pereira Vilalba (1841) and Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva (1951) was played in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (E21). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ricardo Pereira Vilalba games or Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva games? This Ricardo Pereira Vilalba vs Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ricardo Pereira Vilalba vs Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva?
Ricardo Pereira Vilalba vs Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Ricardo Pereira Vilalba vs Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (ECO E21).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ricardo Pereira Vilalba vs Alexandre Pacheco Saraiva, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.