Gabriel Tortola Flores Vieira vs Sandro Augusto Ziarecki
2011 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Open (B33).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Gabriel Tortola Flores Vieira vs Sandro Augusto Ziarecki with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Gabriel Tortola Flores Vieira (2175)
- Black
- Sandro Augusto Ziarecki (2128)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Open (B33)
About this chess game
This chess game between Gabriel Tortola Flores Vieira (2175) and Sandro Augusto Ziarecki (2128) was played in 2011 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Open (B33). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Gabriel Tortola Flores Vieira games or Sandro Augusto Ziarecki games? This Gabriel Tortola Flores Vieira vs Sandro Augusto Ziarecki encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Open.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Gabriel Tortola Flores Vieira vs Sandro Augusto Ziarecki?
Gabriel Tortola Flores Vieira vs Sandro Augusto Ziarecki (2011) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Gabriel Tortola Flores Vieira vs Sandro Augusto Ziarecki?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Open (ECO B33).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Gabriel Tortola Flores Vieira vs Sandro Augusto Ziarecki, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.