Jose Renato Braga S. Vieira vs Tiago Pereira Rodrigues
2019 · Result ½–½ · Semi-Slav Defense Accepted (D44).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jose Renato Braga S. Vieira vs Tiago Pereira Rodrigues with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jose Renato Braga S. Vieira (1852)
- Black
- Tiago Pereira Rodrigues (2152)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Semi-Slav Defense Accepted (D44)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jose Renato Braga S. Vieira (1852) and Tiago Pereira Rodrigues (2152) was played in 2019 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Semi-Slav Defense Accepted (D44). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jose Renato Braga S. Vieira games or Tiago Pereira Rodrigues games? This Jose Renato Braga S. Vieira vs Tiago Pereira Rodrigues encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Semi-Slav Defense Accepted.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jose Renato Braga S. Vieira vs Tiago Pereira Rodrigues?
Jose Renato Braga S. Vieira vs Tiago Pereira Rodrigues (2019) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Jose Renato Braga S. Vieira vs Tiago Pereira Rodrigues?
The game opened with the Semi-Slav Defense Accepted (ECO D44).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jose Renato Braga S. Vieira vs Tiago Pereira Rodrigues, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.