Santosh Gujrathi Vidit vs Saptarshi Roy Chowdhury
2012 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Agincourt Defense (A13).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Santosh Gujrathi Vidit vs Saptarshi Roy Chowdhury with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Santosh Gujrathi Vidit (2527)
- Black
- Saptarshi Roy Chowdhury (2441)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- English Opening: Agincourt Defense (A13)
About this chess game
This chess game between Santosh Gujrathi Vidit (2527) and Saptarshi Roy Chowdhury (2441) was played in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Agincourt Defense (A13). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Santosh Gujrathi Vidit games or Saptarshi Roy Chowdhury games? This Santosh Gujrathi Vidit vs Saptarshi Roy Chowdhury encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Agincourt Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Santosh Gujrathi Vidit vs Saptarshi Roy Chowdhury?
Santosh Gujrathi Vidit vs Saptarshi Roy Chowdhury (2012) finished 1–0, a win for Santosh Gujrathi Vidit.
What opening was played in Santosh Gujrathi Vidit vs Saptarshi Roy Chowdhury?
The game opened with the English Opening: Agincourt Defense (ECO A13).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Santosh Gujrathi Vidit vs Saptarshi Roy Chowdhury, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.