Arturo Vidarte Morales vs Ricard Nadal Fajardo
2018 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Mikenas-Carls Variation (A18).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Arturo Vidarte Morales vs Ricard Nadal Fajardo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Arturo Vidarte Morales (2374)
- Black
- Ricard Nadal Fajardo (1915)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- English Opening: Mikenas-Carls Variation (A18)
About this chess game
This chess game between Arturo Vidarte Morales (2374) and Ricard Nadal Fajardo (1915) was played in 2018 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Mikenas-Carls Variation (A18). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Arturo Vidarte Morales games or Ricard Nadal Fajardo games? This Arturo Vidarte Morales vs Ricard Nadal Fajardo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Mikenas-Carls Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Arturo Vidarte Morales vs Ricard Nadal Fajardo?
Arturo Vidarte Morales vs Ricard Nadal Fajardo (2018) finished 1–0, a win for Arturo Vidarte Morales.
What opening was played in Arturo Vidarte Morales vs Ricard Nadal Fajardo?
The game opened with the English Opening: Mikenas-Carls Variation (ECO A18).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Arturo Vidarte Morales vs Ricard Nadal Fajardo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.