Arturo Vidarte Morales vs Jaime Cabello Cabello
2012 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Arturo Vidarte Morales vs Jaime Cabello Cabello with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Arturo Vidarte Morales (2319)
- Black
- Jaime Cabello Cabello (1856)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02)
About this chess game
This chess game between Arturo Vidarte Morales (2319) and Jaime Cabello Cabello (1856) was played in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Arturo Vidarte Morales games or Jaime Cabello Cabello games? This Arturo Vidarte Morales vs Jaime Cabello Cabello encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Arturo Vidarte Morales vs Jaime Cabello Cabello?
Arturo Vidarte Morales vs Jaime Cabello Cabello (2012) finished 1–0, a win for Arturo Vidarte Morales.
What opening was played in Arturo Vidarte Morales vs Jaime Cabello Cabello?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (ECO D02).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Arturo Vidarte Morales vs Jaime Cabello Cabello, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.