Alex Vidal Zamora vs Francesc Fernandez Garcia
2016 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E92).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alex Vidal Zamora vs Francesc Fernandez Garcia with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alex Vidal Zamora (2309)
- Black
- Francesc Fernandez Garcia (2075)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E92)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alex Vidal Zamora (2309) and Francesc Fernandez Garcia (2075) was played in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E92). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alex Vidal Zamora games or Francesc Fernandez Garcia games? This Alex Vidal Zamora vs Francesc Fernandez Garcia encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alex Vidal Zamora vs Francesc Fernandez Garcia?
Alex Vidal Zamora vs Francesc Fernandez Garcia (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Alex Vidal Zamora.
What opening was played in Alex Vidal Zamora vs Francesc Fernandez Garcia?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (ECO E92).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alex Vidal Zamora vs Francesc Fernandez Garcia, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.