Savva Vetokhin vs Aleksey Goganov
Pearl Rapid 2023, 2023 · Result ½–½ · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System (E53).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Savva Vetokhin vs Aleksey Goganov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Savva Vetokhin (2400)
- Black
- Aleksey Goganov (2519)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Pearl Rapid 2023
- Year
- 2023
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System (E53)
About this chess game
This chess game between Savva Vetokhin (2400) and Aleksey Goganov (2519) was played at Pearl Rapid 2023 in 2023 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System (E53). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Savva Vetokhin games or Aleksey Goganov games? This Savva Vetokhin vs Aleksey Goganov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Savva Vetokhin vs Aleksey Goganov?
Savva Vetokhin vs Aleksey Goganov (2023) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Savva Vetokhin vs Aleksey Goganov?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System (ECO E53).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Savva Vetokhin vs Aleksey Goganov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.