Michael E. Vesterli vs Nikolai Skousen
33. Copenhagen Open (Politiken Cup), 2011 · Result 0–1 · Indian Defense: Anti-Nimzo-Indian (E10).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Michael E. Vesterli vs Nikolai Skousen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Michael E. Vesterli (1969)
- Black
- Nikolai Skousen (2293)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 33. Copenhagen Open (Politiken Cup)
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Indian Defense: Anti-Nimzo-Indian (E10)
About this chess game
This chess game between Michael E. Vesterli (1969) and Nikolai Skousen (2293) was played at 33. Copenhagen Open (Politiken Cup) in 2011 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Indian Defense: Anti-Nimzo-Indian (E10). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Michael E. Vesterli games or Nikolai Skousen games? This Michael E. Vesterli vs Nikolai Skousen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Indian Defense: Anti-Nimzo-Indian.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Michael E. Vesterli vs Nikolai Skousen?
Michael E. Vesterli vs Nikolai Skousen (2011) finished 0–1, a win for Nikolai Skousen.
What opening was played in Michael E. Vesterli vs Nikolai Skousen?
The game opened with the Indian Defense: Anti-Nimzo-Indian (ECO E10).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Michael E. Vesterli vs Nikolai Skousen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.