Pietro Vertechi vs Gian Giacomo Petragnani
2009 · Result ½–½ · Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (A42).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Pietro Vertechi vs Gian Giacomo Petragnani with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Pietro Vertechi (1882)
- Black
- Gian Giacomo Petragnani (1674)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (A42)
About this chess game
This chess game between Pietro Vertechi (1882) and Gian Giacomo Petragnani (1674) was played in 2009 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (A42). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Pietro Vertechi games or Gian Giacomo Petragnani games? This Pietro Vertechi vs Gian Giacomo Petragnani encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Pietro Vertechi vs Gian Giacomo Petragnani?
Pietro Vertechi vs Gian Giacomo Petragnani (2009) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Pietro Vertechi vs Gian Giacomo Petragnani?
The game opened with the Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (ECO A42).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Pietro Vertechi vs Gian Giacomo Petragnani, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.