Gabriela Vercino vs Lesly Viviane Montufar Berrios
2016 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation (B51).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Gabriela Vercino vs Lesly Viviane Montufar Berrios with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Gabriela Vercino (1599)
- Black
- Lesly Viviane Montufar Berrios (2038)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation (B51)
About this chess game
This chess game between Gabriela Vercino (1599) and Lesly Viviane Montufar Berrios (2038) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation (B51). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Gabriela Vercino games or Lesly Viviane Montufar Berrios games? This Gabriela Vercino vs Lesly Viviane Montufar Berrios encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Gabriela Vercino vs Lesly Viviane Montufar Berrios?
Gabriela Vercino vs Lesly Viviane Montufar Berrios (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Gabriela Vercino vs Lesly Viviane Montufar Berrios?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation (ECO B51).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Gabriela Vercino vs Lesly Viviane Montufar Berrios, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.