Juan Diego Velez Rueda vs Sebastian Felipe Sanchez
2016 · Result 1–0 · Benoni Defense: Modern Variation (A60).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Juan Diego Velez Rueda vs Sebastian Felipe Sanchez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Juan Diego Velez Rueda (1841)
- Black
- Sebastian Felipe Sanchez (2383)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Benoni Defense: Modern Variation (A60)
About this chess game
This chess game between Juan Diego Velez Rueda (1841) and Sebastian Felipe Sanchez (2383) was played in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Benoni Defense: Modern Variation (A60). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Juan Diego Velez Rueda games or Sebastian Felipe Sanchez games? This Juan Diego Velez Rueda vs Sebastian Felipe Sanchez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Benoni Defense: Modern Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Juan Diego Velez Rueda vs Sebastian Felipe Sanchez?
Juan Diego Velez Rueda vs Sebastian Felipe Sanchez (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Juan Diego Velez Rueda.
What opening was played in Juan Diego Velez Rueda vs Sebastian Felipe Sanchez?
The game opened with the Benoni Defense: Modern Variation (ECO A60).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Juan Diego Velez Rueda vs Sebastian Felipe Sanchez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.