Juan Luis Velez Romero vs Jose Luis Ayala Abenza
2016 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D05).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Juan Luis Velez Romero vs Jose Luis Ayala Abenza with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Juan Luis Velez Romero (1987)
- Black
- Jose Luis Ayala Abenza (2020)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D05)
About this chess game
This chess game between Juan Luis Velez Romero (1987) and Jose Luis Ayala Abenza (2020) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D05). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Juan Luis Velez Romero games or Jose Luis Ayala Abenza games? This Juan Luis Velez Romero vs Jose Luis Ayala Abenza encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Juan Luis Velez Romero vs Jose Luis Ayala Abenza?
Juan Luis Velez Romero vs Jose Luis Ayala Abenza (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Juan Luis Velez Romero vs Jose Luis Ayala Abenza?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (ECO D05).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Juan Luis Velez Romero vs Jose Luis Ayala Abenza, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.