Endre Vegh vs Sandor Farago
FSIM August 2016, 2016 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation (A36).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Endre Vegh vs Sandor Farago with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Endre Vegh (2274)
- Black
- Sandor Farago (2264)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- FSIM August 2016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation (A36)
About this chess game
This chess game between Endre Vegh (2274) and Sandor Farago (2264) was played at FSIM August 2016 in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation (A36). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Endre Vegh games or Sandor Farago games? This Endre Vegh vs Sandor Farago encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Endre Vegh vs Sandor Farago?
Endre Vegh vs Sandor Farago (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Endre Vegh vs Sandor Farago?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation (ECO A36).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Endre Vegh vs Sandor Farago, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.