Cesar Octavio Vega Lopez de Nava vs Ralf Ullmann
2018 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: French Variation (B40).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Cesar Octavio Vega Lopez de Nava vs Ralf Ullmann with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Cesar Octavio Vega Lopez de Nava (1949)
- Black
- Ralf Ullmann (1910)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: French Variation (B40)
About this chess game
This chess game between Cesar Octavio Vega Lopez de Nava (1949) and Ralf Ullmann (1910) was played in 2018 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: French Variation (B40). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Cesar Octavio Vega Lopez de Nava games or Ralf Ullmann games? This Cesar Octavio Vega Lopez de Nava vs Ralf Ullmann encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: French Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Cesar Octavio Vega Lopez de Nava vs Ralf Ullmann?
Cesar Octavio Vega Lopez de Nava vs Ralf Ullmann (2018) finished 1–0, a win for Cesar Octavio Vega Lopez de Nava.
What opening was played in Cesar Octavio Vega Lopez de Nava vs Ralf Ullmann?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: French Variation (ECO B40).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Cesar Octavio Vega Lopez de Nava vs Ralf Ullmann, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.