Serghei Vedmediuc vs Sergey Pavlov
12. V. Nabokov Mem GM, 2015 · Result ½–½ · Slav Defense: Exchange Variation, Symmetrical Line (D14).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Serghei Vedmediuc vs Sergey Pavlov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Serghei Vedmediuc (2414)
- Black
- Sergey Pavlov (2003)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 12. V. Nabokov Mem GM
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Exchange Variation, Symmetrical Line (D14)
About this chess game
This chess game between Serghei Vedmediuc (2414) and Sergey Pavlov (2003) was played at 12. V. Nabokov Mem GM in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Slav Defense: Exchange Variation, Symmetrical Line (D14). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Serghei Vedmediuc games or Sergey Pavlov games? This Serghei Vedmediuc vs Sergey Pavlov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Exchange Variation, Symmetrical Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Serghei Vedmediuc vs Sergey Pavlov?
Serghei Vedmediuc vs Sergey Pavlov (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Serghei Vedmediuc vs Sergey Pavlov?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Exchange Variation, Symmetrical Line (ECO D14).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Serghei Vedmediuc vs Sergey Pavlov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.