Richard Vedder vs Johan Van de Griend
HZ Open 2013, 2013 · Result 1–0 · Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Open Variation (C56).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Richard Vedder vs Johan Van de Griend with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Richard Vedder (2238)
- Black
- Johan Van de Griend (1959)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- HZ Open 2013
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Open Variation (C56)
About this chess game
This chess game between Richard Vedder (2238) and Johan Van de Griend (1959) was played at HZ Open 2013 in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Open Variation (C56). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Richard Vedder games or Johan Van de Griend games? This Richard Vedder vs Johan Van de Griend encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Open Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Richard Vedder vs Johan Van de Griend?
Richard Vedder vs Johan Van de Griend (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Richard Vedder.
What opening was played in Richard Vedder vs Johan Van de Griend?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Open Variation (ECO C56).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Richard Vedder vs Johan Van de Griend, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.