Vladislav Vdovichenko vs Alexey Shakh
2007 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation, Traditional System (D26).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Vladislav Vdovichenko vs Alexey Shakh with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Vladislav Vdovichenko (2191)
- Black
- Alexey Shakh
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2007
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation, Traditional System (D26)
About this chess game
This chess game between Vladislav Vdovichenko (2191) and Alexey Shakh was played in 2007 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation, Traditional System (D26). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Vladislav Vdovichenko games or Alexey Shakh games? This Vladislav Vdovichenko vs Alexey Shakh encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation, Traditional System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Vladislav Vdovichenko vs Alexey Shakh?
Vladislav Vdovichenko vs Alexey Shakh (2007) finished 1–0, a win for Vladislav Vdovichenko.
What opening was played in Vladislav Vdovichenko vs Alexey Shakh?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation, Traditional System (ECO D26).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Vladislav Vdovichenko vs Alexey Shakh, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.