Jesus Vazquez Gonzalez vs Federico Lopez Orellana
2019 · Result 1–0 · Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation (A95).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jesus Vazquez Gonzalez vs Federico Lopez Orellana with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jesus Vazquez Gonzalez (1916)
- Black
- Federico Lopez Orellana (1732)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation (A95)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jesus Vazquez Gonzalez (1916) and Federico Lopez Orellana (1732) was played in 2019 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation (A95). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jesus Vazquez Gonzalez games or Federico Lopez Orellana games? This Jesus Vazquez Gonzalez vs Federico Lopez Orellana encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jesus Vazquez Gonzalez vs Federico Lopez Orellana?
Jesus Vazquez Gonzalez vs Federico Lopez Orellana (2019) finished 1–0, a win for Jesus Vazquez Gonzalez.
What opening was played in Jesus Vazquez Gonzalez vs Federico Lopez Orellana?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation (ECO A95).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jesus Vazquez Gonzalez vs Federico Lopez Orellana, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.