Sergey Vazovski vs Josef Riha
FICGS__CHESS__UNRATED_TOURNAMENT__000011, 2010 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Sergey Vazovski vs Josef Riha with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Sergey Vazovski (1745)
- Black
- Josef Riha (2041)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- FICGS__CHESS__UNRATED_TOURNAMENT__000011
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31)
About this chess game
This chess game between Sergey Vazovski (1745) and Josef Riha (2041) was played at FICGS__CHESS__UNRATED_TOURNAMENT__000011 in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Sergey Vazovski games or Josef Riha games? This Sergey Vazovski vs Josef Riha encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Sergey Vazovski vs Josef Riha?
Sergey Vazovski vs Josef Riha (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Josef Riha.
What opening was played in Sergey Vazovski vs Josef Riha?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (ECO D31).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Sergey Vazovski vs Josef Riha, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.