Ethan Vaz vs Caleb Levi Levitan
Vezerkepzo GM New Year, 2024 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ethan Vaz vs Caleb Levi Levitan with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ethan Vaz (2403)
- Black
- Caleb Levi Levitan (2317)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Vezerkepzo GM New Year
- Year
- 2024
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ethan Vaz (2403) and Caleb Levi Levitan (2317) was played at Vezerkepzo GM New Year in 2024 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ethan Vaz games or Caleb Levi Levitan games? This Ethan Vaz vs Caleb Levi Levitan encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ethan Vaz vs Caleb Levi Levitan?
Ethan Vaz vs Caleb Levi Levitan (2024) finished 1–0, a win for Ethan Vaz.
What opening was played in Ethan Vaz vs Caleb Levi Levitan?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (ECO B92).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ethan Vaz vs Caleb Levi Levitan, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.