Peter Vavrak vs Janos Konnyu
Int ch-SVK OpenA, 2010 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (E67).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Peter Vavrak vs Janos Konnyu with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Peter Vavrak (2467)
- Black
- Janos Konnyu (2353)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Int ch-SVK OpenA
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (E67)
About this chess game
This chess game between Peter Vavrak (2467) and Janos Konnyu (2353) was played at Int ch-SVK OpenA in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (E67). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Peter Vavrak games or Janos Konnyu games? This Peter Vavrak vs Janos Konnyu encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Peter Vavrak vs Janos Konnyu?
Peter Vavrak vs Janos Konnyu (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Peter Vavrak vs Janos Konnyu?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (ECO E67).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Peter Vavrak vs Janos Konnyu, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.