Kestutis Vasylius vs Gediminas Sarakauskas
2011 · Result ½–½ · Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense (C58).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Kestutis Vasylius vs Gediminas Sarakauskas with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Kestutis Vasylius (2073)
- Black
- Gediminas Sarakauskas (2440)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense (C58)
About this chess game
This chess game between Kestutis Vasylius (2073) and Gediminas Sarakauskas (2440) was played in 2011 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense (C58). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Kestutis Vasylius games or Gediminas Sarakauskas games? This Kestutis Vasylius vs Gediminas Sarakauskas encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Kestutis Vasylius vs Gediminas Sarakauskas?
Kestutis Vasylius vs Gediminas Sarakauskas (2011) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Kestutis Vasylius vs Gediminas Sarakauskas?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense (ECO C58).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Kestutis Vasylius vs Gediminas Sarakauskas, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.