Veileven Varshini vs V Toshali
2016 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Stockholm Attack (B74).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Veileven Varshini vs V Toshali with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Veileven Varshini (2271)
- Black
- V Toshali (1856)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Stockholm Attack (B74)
About this chess game
This chess game between Veileven Varshini (2271) and V Toshali (1856) was played in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Stockholm Attack (B74). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Veileven Varshini games or V Toshali games? This Veileven Varshini vs V Toshali encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Stockholm Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Veileven Varshini vs V Toshali?
Veileven Varshini vs V Toshali (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Veileven Varshini.
What opening was played in Veileven Varshini vs V Toshali?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Stockholm Attack (ECO B74).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Veileven Varshini vs V Toshali, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.