Hannu Varonen vs Erkki Urpilainen
FIN/ENM/SF/2 (FIN), 2016 · Result 0–1 · Benoni Defense: Classical Variation, Czerniak Defense (A78).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Hannu Varonen vs Erkki Urpilainen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Hannu Varonen (1626)
- Black
- Erkki Urpilainen (2169)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- FIN/ENM/SF/2 (FIN)
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Benoni Defense: Classical Variation, Czerniak Defense (A78)
About this chess game
This chess game between Hannu Varonen (1626) and Erkki Urpilainen (2169) was played at FIN/ENM/SF/2 (FIN) in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Benoni Defense: Classical Variation, Czerniak Defense (A78). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Hannu Varonen games or Erkki Urpilainen games? This Hannu Varonen vs Erkki Urpilainen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Benoni Defense: Classical Variation, Czerniak Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Hannu Varonen vs Erkki Urpilainen?
Hannu Varonen vs Erkki Urpilainen (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Erkki Urpilainen.
What opening was played in Hannu Varonen vs Erkki Urpilainen?
The game opened with the Benoni Defense: Classical Variation, Czerniak Defense (ECO A78).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Hannu Varonen vs Erkki Urpilainen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.