Peter Varley vs Peter Nurmi
1977 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Spielmann Defense (A32).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Peter Varley vs Peter Nurmi with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Peter Varley (2225)
- Black
- Peter Nurmi (2240)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 1977
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Spielmann Defense (A32)
About this chess game
This chess game between Peter Varley (2225) and Peter Nurmi (2240) was played in 1977 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Spielmann Defense (A32). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Peter Varley games or Peter Nurmi games? This Peter Varley vs Peter Nurmi encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Spielmann Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Peter Varley vs Peter Nurmi?
Peter Varley vs Peter Nurmi (1977) finished 1–0, a win for Peter Varley.
What opening was played in Peter Varley vs Peter Nurmi?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation, Spielmann Defense (ECO A32).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Peter Varley vs Peter Nurmi, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.