Wilhelm Varkentin vs Alfia Nasybullina
2014 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Petrosian Variation, Normal Defense (E93).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Wilhelm Varkentin vs Alfia Nasybullina with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Wilhelm Varkentin (1913)
- Black
- Alfia Nasybullina (2133)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Petrosian Variation, Normal Defense (E93)
About this chess game
This chess game between Wilhelm Varkentin (1913) and Alfia Nasybullina (2133) was played in 2014 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Petrosian Variation, Normal Defense (E93). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Wilhelm Varkentin games or Alfia Nasybullina games? This Wilhelm Varkentin vs Alfia Nasybullina encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Petrosian Variation, Normal Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Wilhelm Varkentin vs Alfia Nasybullina?
Wilhelm Varkentin vs Alfia Nasybullina (2014) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Wilhelm Varkentin vs Alfia Nasybullina?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Petrosian Variation, Normal Defense (ECO E93).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Wilhelm Varkentin vs Alfia Nasybullina, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.